Hi all.

First, I would like to apologize for the previous message. Maybe I've been
too "harsh"? Sorry for that.

Second, I would like to list all the energetic contributions for one (same
system, different run) run that g_energy allowed me to get:

Energy                      Average       RMSD     Fluct.      Drift
Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bond                        2.05116  0.0591887          0  -0.123751   -
30.9381
Angle                         2.638  0.0664036          0   0.114896
28.7242
LJ (SR)                    -14.3726  0.0865671          0 -0.0877988   -
21.9499
Disper. corr.             -0.378693 0.00211843          0 -0.00185533  -
0.463837
Coulomb (SR)               0.128875  0.0164563          0 0.000956545
0.239138
Coulomb (LR)             0.00237452 4.3944e-05          0 3.95014e-05
0.00987542
Coul. recip.               -145.145   0.660423   0.652976 -0.00137031   -
0.34258
Potential                  -10.2211   0.138681          0 -0.0988822   -
24.7207
Kinetic En.                 7.67642  0.0990863  0.0988019 0.000103943
0.025986
Total Energy               -2.54473   0.167497          0 -0.0987789   -
24.6949

Temperature                  123.15     1.5896     1.5896 3.34002e-06
0.000835011

Ok, those are with nmol 500, but it doesn't seem to matter that much. If
anybody asks, I can do all them again without that.

Any help would be really thankfull!

Sincerally yours,

Jones

On 6/23/07, David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jones de Andrade wrote:
> Hi David!
>
> Ha, so there is something extra? Thanks a lot.... :)   I knew I was
> forgeting something.
>
> So how should I deal with it? I mean, what are the contibutions that are
> inside the "Potential" option of g_energy? Does it include all
> corrections, disp.corr. ones also, or there is something missing?
>
these are inside the Coulomb LR (PME) or some other Coulomb term (RF
corrections).

Energy is of course the sum of all terms. Try without the nmol flag to
g_energy first.

> Thanks a lot!
>
> Jones
>
> On 6/23/07, *David van der Spoel* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Jones de Andrade wrote:
>      > Hi Mark.
>      >
>      > Haven't got exactly what you said. So let me rephrase myself:
>      >
>      > The CF4 molecule doesn't have dihedrals nor intramolecular LJ and
>      > coulombic contributions.
>      >
>      > What kind of contribution am I missing that makes potential
>     energy minus
>      > bond stretching minus angle bending *different* from Lj +
>     coulomb(SR) +
>      > coulomb (LR) + Disp correction?
>      >
>      > Thanks a lot in advance,
>      >
>      > Sincerally yours,
>      >
>      > Jones
>      >
>     I didn't follow the whole discussion, but there are also exclusion
>     corrections when using PME or RF.
>
>     --
>     David.
>
________________________________________________________________________
>     David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
>     Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
>     Husargatan 3, Box 596,          75124 Uppsala, Sweden
>     phone:  46 18 471 4205          fax: 46 18 511 755
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>     _______________________________________________
>     gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
>     <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
>     http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>     Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>     posting!
>     Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>     www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>     Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,          75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205          fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to