I am interested in obtaining forces on particular atoms at each integration step. It seems wasteful to use "nstfout = 1" when I only want the forces on a couple atoms out of tens of thousands.

My point of interest is this: If I am doing umbrella sampling over a spatial coordinate or using dihedral_restraints to generate the PMF about a torsion, I am currently limited to data processing by WHAM. However, I think that force integration should be more accurate. I can easily subtract the biasing force myself if I save every coordinate using xtc_grps since I need to know the position along the reaction coordinate anyway in order to properly generate my histogram bins.

Perhaps it is possible to rig the pull code or the free-energy in order to output what I desire without actually doing any pulling/switching of lambda values? I looked into the 3.3 manual pages 35,66,104,119,149 re: free energy code but nothing was immediately apparent.

If not, let me please put in my request for two new .mdp options:
1. "nstfrcout" that defines the number of steps between outputting selected forces to a special file = "traj.frc"
2. "force_grps" that controls output selection to the new file = "traj.frc"
* This is intended to have no effect on nstfout.

While I'm at it, the ability to make more than one .xtc file with different output selections nstxtcout, xtc_grps, xtc_precision, is desirable for example when one wants to save a small group of selected coordinates every step for processing and the entire coordinates once and a while for later system analysis.

I have added these items to the wiki wish-list
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php?title=Category:Development&action=submit#Wish_list

Many thanks,
Chris.

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to