Thanks for your help.
I have also tried the "comm_grps = System" option, and did energy
minimization but after that also water molecular looked like the previous
case (Figure-B, in my previous post).
Thanks for trying that, I guess it was not the problem. As you
mentioned on another post, 2.5A is way to large and this is indicative
of problems. I did see your make_hole plots and the general features
look fine. I think that my second step of hole making was with a
significantly larger force (1000?) but i don't have my notes with me.
Send me your files off-list and I will take a look. chris.neale at utoronto.ca
.top (all... there should be one with and one without the protein)
.itp (e.g. "Protein_D.itp" and any other modified ffoplsaanb.itp?)
.mdp (all)
.gro (only the first one)
If you don't want to share your files then one thing that I like to do
to debug is to save the coordinates every single step to the .xtc and
then you load the initial .gro into vmd then load the .xtc into that
structure and watch carefully and see what is going on when things
start looking strange. (PS, do that anyway even if you do send me the
files please).
Finally, as I believe that Mark already touched on, check the order of
atoms as they are defined in the [molecules] section of your .top file
as compared to your .gro file.
Chris.
Regards,
Alok
>Dear All,
>
>I am doing the simulation of POPE lipid + Protein, I did my system
setup using mdrun_hole program. It looks fine to me
http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj58/gromacs/all-three_final.gif
(Figure-A). When I was doing energy minimization (using steepest decent
and conjugant gradient algorithm), water molecules diffuse a lot,
structure looks very weird (Figure-B). But only after 1ps mdrun (NVT
ensemble) it comes back to its normal (Figure-C). But during this 1ps I
got lots of LINCE warning, all for water molecules. If I continue my
simulation (till now ~5ns production run) I do not get any
problem/warning.
>
>So I just want to know should I proceed further, or I have to come
back to my initial state and resolve this problem?
>Previously I tried different options by changing value of emtol but I
could not resolve this problem. So I proceeded. By this mail, I am
requesting expert comments from you people. Is it normal to Membrane
simulation or there is some problem in my system? Till now I have not
encountered any problems/warning.
>
>Eagerly waiting for your reply,
>
>Best regards,
>Alok Jain
>
>
>@Mark:
>Thanks a lot for your reply/comments and time. I am using TIP4P water
model, and I really could not understand why it happens, Some of the
bonds of the water molecules are broken down, and after 1ps MD they
make bonds again. Is it not very strange? I have tried to visualize in
different visualization tool but still problem was persisting. I was not
able to implement your suggestion regarding tolerance limit of the
visualization software, I used rasmol, chimera, insightII but could not
found any such option. I am still trying for that, if I could found it,
I will inform you the result after that. I am really worried about
temporary LINCE warning
>which I was getting. Is there any way to resolve this issue?
Use VMD and set your representation to "dynamic bonds", then there is a
sliding bar that determines how to detect bonds.
Easier yet, load your initial (presumable ok) structure from figure A
into VMD, then load in the figure B structure as a new frame
in the original structure. This will draw the representation of fig B
using the topology as determined from fig A.
>
>I am pasting the em.mdp and my top file below.
>
>@chris: Thanks for your time spent on investigating on my problem.
Thanks for creating the public album. I am sorry to say I could not get
your statement "In the worst case scenario that I can imagine, temporary
lincs warning could represent a chiral inversion that will never be
resolved and never give you any more warning messages, but would
definitely give you the wrong answer." could you please explain it a
little more (in layman term) because as I think there is no Chiral
center in water so what it
>means by chiral inversion.
Yes, water has no chiral center. But your protein does. In the midst of
all those LINCS warnings,
you might have had one about your protein, and it is even possible that
only the first N LINCS errors
are reported (you could ask a developer about that) so possibly you have
protein angles rotating
too much during minimization steps without knowing it.
Regarding what I mean by a chiral inversion... If forces get too high in
EM, it is entirely possible that
totally unphysical things can happen. To give an MD example, a long time
ago (using CHARMM) I was doing
simulated annealing and taking my structure up to 5000K. At that
temperature, I had some strange rearrangements
where the Ca of a Trp had a "chiral inversion" (perhaps not the correct
term?) in which my L-Trp became D-Trp.
Then upon cooling, the molecule no longer had enough energy to overcome
this L to D barrier of the improper and
note that impropers do not enforce L amino acids, they just hinder L->D
or D->L conversions.
>I have also plotted the two plots to validate my final structure of
mdrun_hole program and uploaded these plots at
http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj58/gromacs/hole-depth-atom1.jpg As
I pasted below my em.mdp file. I was using FLEXIBLE TIP4P water molecules.
>
>
>
>
>em.mdp
>----------
>
>define = -DFLEXIBLE
>constraints = none
>integrator = steep
>nsteps = 10000
>;
>; Energy minimizing stuff
>;
>emtol = 100
>emstep = 0.001
>nstcgsteep = 1000
>
>comm_mode = Linear
>nstcomm = 1
>comm_grps = Protein_POP SOL
>ns_type = grid
>rlist = 0.9
>coulombtype = PME
>rcoulomb = 0.9
>vdw-type = Cut-off
>rvdw = 1.2
>fourierspacing = 0.12
>pme_order = 4
>ewald_rtol = 1e-5
>optimize_fft = yes
>Tcoupl = no
>Pcoupl = no
>gen_vel = no
>
>
Are you sure about "comm_grps = Protein_POP SOL" ??
Try with "comm_grps = System"
Chris.
>
>top file:
>--------------
>
>; Include forcefield parameters
>#include "/home/lysine/ffoplsaa.itp"
>
>; Include chain topologies
>#include "Protein_A.itp"
>#include "Protein_B.itp"
>#include "Protein_C.itp"
>#include "Protein_D.itp"
>
>#include "pope_opls.itp"
>
>; Include water topology
>#include "tip4p.itp"
>
>
>#ifdef POSRES_WATER
>; Position restraint for each water oxygen
>[ position_restraints ]
>; i funct fcx fcy fcz
> 1 1 10000 10000 10000
>#endif
>
>; Include generic topology for ions
>#include "ions.itp"
>
>[ system ]
>; Name
>protein + POPE + TIP4P water molecules
>
>[ molecules ]
>; Compound #mols
>Protein_A 1
>Protein_B 1
>Protein_C 1
>Protein_D 1
>POPE 269
>SOL 13800
>
>
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:07:43 -0500
From: "Myunggi Yi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Turn off the diheral energy
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thank you so much.
On Jan 30, 2008 2:57 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Myunggi Yi,
>
> Mixing force fields is an intrinsically bad idea. See
> http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Parameterization
>
I second that...
> > Is it possible to turn off dihedral energy (proper and improper) for a
> > certain molecule?
> > If yes, then how can I do this?
>
> Comment out these parts of your topology file.
>
You can do this easily by enclosing the dihedral section with an
#ifdef ... #endif block, and use a control #define statement upstream
of it:
#define INCLUDE_DIHEDRALS
#ifdef INCLUDE_DIHEDRALS
[ dihedrals ]
...
...
...
#endif
This even allows you to control it through the .mdp file, including the
line
define = -DINCLUDE_DIHEDRALS
Hope it helps,
Tsjerk
--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
Best wishes,
MYUNGGI YI
==================================
KLB 419
Institute of Molecular Biophysics
Florida State University
Tallahassee, FL 32306
Office: (850) 645-1334
http://www.scs.fsu.edu/~myunggi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20080130/e37fc9ab/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list
gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
End of gmx-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 126
******************************************
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
