David van der Spoel wrote: > Ran Friedman wrote: >> Berk Hess wrote: >>> It would also make the code more complicated than it already is. >>> >>> Berk. >> It may be useful to incorporate these things as part of the source >> but to compile them only if requested by the user, as done e.g. in >> some features of charmm. This will make the main code only minimally >> more complex I guess. > This is basically how things work with some libraries, like FFT etc > and also with the QMMM interface. > >> >> There were recently several contributions that didn't make it to the >> main code. This is very understandable, but I guess that as the GMX >> code evolves, those contributions become outdated and force their >> users to use older versions (at least for a while) or simply phase out. > > Just wondering, but what are you thinking of here? Stuff that goes to > the contribution page on the website? Could be, but I was thinking about things like GMX/CPMD, GMX/metadynamics and interfaces with programs that solve the PB equation.
Ran. _______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
