rams rams wrote:
Hi Vitaly Chaban,

The calcualted value of velocity autocorrelation function is 5.8*10^ -8 (momentum auto correlation function is 0.99279 and the protein mass is 4121.209 gm/mol). The resulting velocity auto correlation function will be in A^2/ps^2. If I devide this by a factor of 3, I will get the diffusion constant as 1.9 * 10^ -8 A^2/ps^2 which is nothing but 1.9 * 10^ -4 m^2/s^2. But the time factor in mean square displacement should be in m^2 sec^-1. Did I missed any thing here ?
yes. integration adds time in the denominator.

Ram.

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:54 AM, rams rams <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Dear Vitaly Chaban,

    Thanks for your kind sugestions. I did followed the way you
    mentioned for calcualting the diffusion constants. I like to have a
    better understanding of what I have done.

    g_velacc:

    g_velacc  -f   -s  -o  -aceflen

    Since, mine is a single protein, I have not defined any index file
    and I am calculating the g_velacc on backbone atoms.

    as the manual says, -aceflen will define the number of frames to be
    taken into consideration i suppose.

    Here, though with the option -s we are calculting the momentum auto
    correlation function, but still we are considering it as velocity
    auto correlation funciton. Is it alright or as the other user
    mentioned we need to devide the correlation value with square of the
    mass of the protein ?

    g_analyze:

    here, the numerical integration is done by trapezium rule. Ideally
    we need to carryout the integration from 0 to infinity but since our
    auto correlation function is calculated on a short period of time
    (which is close to t=0), the integration is evaluated only on this
    period i suppose. The output I got is the following:


     Calculating the integral using the trapezium rule
    Integral 1     0.99279  +/-    0.00000
                                          std. dev.    relative deviation of
                           standard       ---------   cumulants from
    those of
    set      average       deviation      sqrt(n-1)   a Gaussian
    distribition
                                                          cum. 3   cum. 4
    SS1   3.975160e-02   1.960813e-01   4.002493e-02       2.939    6.669


    is the 0.99279 is the integral value or any thing else ? Which value
    I can compare with the value obtained by g_msd. My g_msd value is
    1.7*10^-6 cm**2/s which is reasonably good compared to the
    experimental value.


    Thanks and Regards,
    Ram.


    On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:18 PM, rams rams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

        How to monitor the motion of center of mass of a protein as it
        is the case all the time to monitor this during the calculations
        of diffusion and correlation functions. How far the values will
        be different if we monitor the motion of backbone atoms rather
        than the center of mass motion.

        I still dont have any idea how to get the diffusion constant
        using g_velacc.

        Ram.

        On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Vitaly Chaban
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

             > No special reason, just mundane ones: computing the
            diffusion constant
             > through mean square displacement is easier in terms of
            convergence.

            But it is not applicable in the anisotropic systems, for
            example in
            ones with spatial confinements present... :)



            --
            Vitaly V. Chaban
            School of Chemistry
            National University of Kharkiv
            Svoboda sq.,4, Kharkiv 61077, Ukraine
            email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
            skype: vvchaban

            _______________________________________________
            gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
            http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
            Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search
            before posting!
            Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
            www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
            Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php





------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to