>>/ Thank you.
    
> />/ But i have one last question:
> />/For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate
>in
> />/vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
> /GROMOS ff is not parameterized for vaccum simulations of the b-something
> version ... have look at the paper.
>
>
> So i should use ffG43b1 instead of the other GROMOS96 force fields?
  
That would be the right choice for the GROMOS43 ff series.
> In the GROMACS manual i found that the cut-off-distance must at least be 1.4
>nm for the GROMOS96 force field.
  
Never believe what is written in a manual :))
It is always better to keep the values that are used for parameterization
(the one I gave you) when using a force field. The idea that bigger = better
does not work ... you change the balance of forces and thus the properties
of the force field.
> So can i use: type = cut-off; rlist = 1.4 and r_x = 1.7?
> (the problem is that the only reference i find for ffG43b1 is the GROMOS
>manual, and that's not free avaible)
  
Any paper from van Gunsteren group or Alan Mark groujp (GROMOS developers)
would describe the simulation setup: no need of the manual for this.
> Thanks for an answer
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
I looked in some older papers but found no values for epsilon_r and _rf. From older posts of this mailing list I got the impression that epsilon_r = 1 and epsilon_rf the value of the relative permitivity of the medium. In the case of a simulation in vacuum epsilon_rf would be also 1 and then I have no correction from the reaction field, also grompp tells me that epsilon_r = epsilon_rf would be meaningless with a reaction field. So I'm puzzeld.
If both epsilon values have the same value, is it then equal to normal cut-offs (type = cut-off)?
Sorry for the many questions.
Thomas


_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to