Hello,
thank you for all your responses up to now. The thing is getting much more
clearer.
Yet, as far as the distance is concerned, this is a little bit worrying,
because I have bonded interactions no more than 0.154 nm away. So a distance
more than a whole nm I think that should be very long so as to keep this
message to go away. If this has to do with the parallelization, then I might
not worry. Yet, physicaly I think that is a very long distance.
I have to say that the same system worked very nicely with the version 4.0.0
and looking it via ngmx I saw nothing worrying. The properties of my system
where reasonable too.
I insist, because in previous gromacs versions I got similar errors and their
cause was due to running on many processors. The run was crashing, yet running
it only in two processors I didn't face such problems. It is also curious
because in version 4.0.0 I didn't see such an error.
The runs I make take a lot of time, so seeing different error messages at
random makes the post process even more difficult. The 1nm you propose I think
that it is a big distance both for the LJ pairs interactions and of course for
the bonded ones. Also I thought that the table extention was a cut-off for the
LJ pairs interactions, which in my case is 5 nm.
The only thing I can think of for now is to run in less processors...
Thank you,
Regards!
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
