Hello,

I see from looking at the source code that the free-energy lambda dependence is now available to the pull code based on pull_kB1. However, this leads to serious problems converging near lambda=1 when pull_k1=large and pull_kB1=0 and in the absence of a restraint (with k=0) the pulled COM is allowed to sample a large volume. I suspect that a soft core lambda dependence would help here, but the descriptions in the .mpd options section of the online manual indicate that this is available only for Lj and coulombic.

Quoting:
"sc_alpha: (0) the soft-core parameter, a value of 0 results in linear interpolation of the LJ and Coulomb interactions"

Does anybody know if it is possible to get soft core potentials for an arbitrary coordinate?

I tested the application of this myself by bypassing the free energy code and simply modifying the A-state pull_k1 value based on lambda 0->1 and then calculating dGdl from the px.xvg file myself. However, I am unclear how one would implement this as soft core. Does anybody know of a good paper that describes the underlying equations that define soft core?

Thanks,
Chris.

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to