Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Mark,
No, I am not trying to build a random number generator and hope that I am not moving in this direction : )

My definition of adsorption energy would be the difference in energy when two species are at an infinite distance and the energy when these species are at an equilibrium distance from each other.

OK, but I think you need to measure a free energy change, using (for example) a PMF generated by the pulling code in GROMACS.

I think the way in which I can measure this energy difference would be to subtract the LJ (LR) energy between an ammonia molecule and the graphene sheet (where the distance between the molecule and the graphene sheet is large) from the LJ (SR) energy between an adsorbed ammonia molecule and the graphene sheet.

That assumes an unrealistic independence of the forcefield contributions. Why would energy not partition over bonded and Coulombic interactions also?

Also, the distinction between LR and SR is merely to do with your twin-range cut-off choices (read manual!). The adsorption process is a transition from no interaction (i.e. outside the LR cutoff) to physical contact. The total LJ interaction energy (if that means anything!) will be partitioned between LR and SR according to distance from the surface.

I am not aware that OPLS-AA was parameterized to produce such values, but would appreciate your comments.

I know nothing about OPLS-AA, but would guess that it wasn't parameterized for graphite, gaseous ammonia or to reproduce adsorption energies. I think you'd have to demonstrate (through simulation or literature reference) suitable behaviour of graphite and gaseous ammonia on their own before trying to simulate them together. If there's some kind of experimental observable about the behaviour of adsorbed ammonia on graphite that you could reproduce, that would be a useful indicator that the force field is doing OK. Absent that, you might just have that random number generator :-)

Mark

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:42:24 +1100
From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Adsorption energy of a single molecule
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4afb4be0.1020...@anu.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Justin,
So when I create the index file with the molecule and the graphene sheet and run g_energy, is the adsorption energy between the adsorbed molecule and the graphene sheet the LJ (SR) energy?

Not necessarily, unless the force field was parameterized to produce such values. First, seek to define what you mean by adsorption (free) energy, then consider how a simulation might measure that. Then, consider whether any force fields exist that might achieve that. Then, test it on a case where you have experimental data.

Other procedures run a much higher risk of producing an expensive random number generator :-)

And will this energy be just the interaction energy between the adsorbed molecule and the graphene sheet (i.e. does the creation of the new index file and executing -rerun cause g_energy to exclude the energies between the other molecules and the graphene sheet)?

Creating an energy group causes mdrun -rerun to report the fraction of the total nonbonded energies that are due to intra- and inter-group interactions. See manual section 3.3

Mark

Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:27:19 -0500
From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Adsorption energy of a single molecule
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4aee4387.40...@vt.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed



Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Justin,
Since I cannot use the original .tpr file, then do I need to run grompp with the new index file to create a "new" .tpr file, "mdtopolnew.tpr"? I assume I then need to modify the energygrps line within the .mdp file to include these new energy groups and then execute "mdrun -rerun mdtraj.trr -s mdtopolnew.tpr". Is this correct?

Yes, that is the point of the -rerun function.

Does executing "mdrun -rerun mdtraj.trr -s mdtopolnew.tpr" cause a molecular dynamics simulation to run once again? If so, then will the exact same molecules that adsorbed on the first MD run be the same ones that adsorb on the second MD run?

The original coordinates are used to re-calculate the energies. No new simulation is performed.

-Justin

Thanks.

Darrell

*********************************************************************** ***********************************************************************


Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:29:36 -0500
From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Adsorption energy of a single molecule
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4aee27f0.50...@vt.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed



Darrell Koskinen wrote:

Hi Justin,
In my simulation, I have just over 100 ammonia molecules and, of
these > molecules, 10 to 20 adsorb onto the graphene sheet. I initially thought > that I would need to tag each one of the ammonia molecules, since I > would not know, in advance of running the simulation, which of these > molecules would adsorb.
Are you suggesting that, after the initial simulation run, which
uses an > index file "index.ndx" and is comprised of three components {System, > Grph, NH3}, I run make_ndx again to assign each adsorbed molecule to its > own index, execute "mdrun -rerun mdtraj.trr -s mdtopol.tpr", where > mdtraj.trr and mdtopol.tpr are the output of the initial simulation, and > then use g_energy to analyze the energies between the groups?
Almost. You can't use the original .tpr file if you are trying to establish new energy monitoring groups. Hence the point of making a new .mdp file. So, re-run the old trajectory with the new .tpr file to take advantage of the new groups.

-Justin

-- ======================================== Justin A. Lemkul Ph.D. Candidate ICTAS Doctoral Scholar Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin ========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to