Hi, 

With the Mark Abraham's scripts and advices, I have finally resolved my 
problems. 

Thank you and see ya on the list 

Stéphane




-------- Message d'origine--------
De: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org de la part de gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
Date: lun. 01/02/2010 17:27
À: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Objet : gmx-users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 7
 
Send gmx-users mailing list submissions to
        gmx-users@gromacs.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        gmx-users-ow...@gromacs.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of gmx-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Fwd: Help for REMD (Mark Abraham)
   2. Re: perl scripts to convert CHARMM ff in GROMACS (Mark Abraham)
   3. Re: density problems when switching from md to sd integrator
      (Aymeric Na?m?)
   4. RE: Re: density problems when switching from md to sd
      integrator (Berk Hess)
   5. [OT] Software package for discontinuous molecular dynamics?
      (DMD) (ms)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:45:01 +1100
From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>
Subject: [gmx-users] Fwd: Help for REMD
To: Gromacs Users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4b66e8ed.8030...@anu.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9; format=flowed

Please keep GROMACS correspondence on the mailing list. Nobody here is a 
private tutor unless you're paying them.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Help for REMD
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:58:08 +0200 (EET)
From: Murat Erman OGUZ <er...@hacettepe.edu.tr>
To: mark.abra...@anu.edu.au

Dear Mr.Mark Abraham
I am Erman Oguz from Turkey Hacettepe University.
I have a problem about Replica Excahange Method on Gromacs.
ý hope you can help me.

I am trying to perform replica exchange MD on a 'protein in
water' system. I have to perform the REMD simulation with 64 different
temperatures.As per advise on wiki,I equilibrated the system at
respective temperatures (total of 64 equilibration simulations in 200 ps).
After this I generated "tpr files" from the equilibrated structure.
when I submit final job for REMD with following command-line

command line: mpirun -np 64 mdrun -multi 64 -replex 1000 -s *_.tpr .....

it gives error that :

t=29.802 ps Water molecule starting at atom 5902 can not be settled.
check for bad contacs and/or reduce time step.

what can I do and how can I do... please help me...


You should start by searching on the GROMACS webpage errors page. The 
reasons for this kind of error are clearly described there, and are 
likely to have nothing to with REMD as such. If they were, you'll have 
to provide much more data for anyone to help.

You should try your .tpr files in a non-replica simulation and see which 
are broken and thus what to do about it. Probably you've not 
equilibrated well enough, or have a broken system, or have a temperature 
range that is too great for your integration to be stable at high T.

Mark


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:54:13 +1100
From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] perl scripts to convert CHARMM ff in GROMACS
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4b66eb15.5090...@anu.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 02/02/10 01:29, ABEL Stephane 175950 wrote:
> Hi GMXusers
>
> I am testing the parameters of CHARMM, it works fine for lipids and protein. 
> This is a great job, thanks to the devellopers But i would like to add some 
> new molecule for solvent (e.g. for TFE) The atom types of TFE are present in 
> the ffcharmm27bon.itp available in latest port (c32b1_release_1.1.zip, 
> dowloaded http://www.dbb.su.se/User:Bjelkmar/Ffcharmm), unfortunately several 
> bonded parameters (for example  F3-CF3, CF3-CT2x, etc..) are missing in 
> ffcharmm27bon.itp file. So I need to convert the missing parameters into 
> gromacs format. In website 
> (URL:http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/76/=charmm_to_gromacs.tgz), I 
> have found that several perl scripts exist for the conversion charmm-->  
> gromacs. The archive is corrupted so, I cannot unpacked the directory to 
> obtain the files.
>
> Where I can find these scripts

Emailed off-list. This package is now deprecated.

Mark


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:58:44 +0100
From: Aymeric Na?m? <ana...@fundp.ac.be>
Subject: [gmx-users] Re: density problems when switching from md to sd
        integrator
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Message-ID: <4b66fa34.40...@fundp.ac.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I have changed tau_t=0.2 for 1.0 but the density is not restored. I have tried 
with the parameters from Villa and Mark (J Comput Chem, 2002, 23, 548)
, tau_t=0.2 and tau_p=2.0 and still get the same density. The self-diffusion 
coefficient is indeed half of that with md with sd and tau_t=0.2 (0.71 vs. 1.48 
10-5 cm2/s)
and about the same with tau_t=1.0 (1.57 10-5 cm2/s). Water is less affected 
(1009 g/L with md and 1007 g/L with sd and tau_t=0.2). What is the reason why 
the density is lowered?

Here is the .mdp file (for the simulation with md, tau_t=0.1):

title               =  cyclohexane
cpp                 =  /lib/cpp -traditional 
define              =  -DFLEXIBLE
constraints         =  none
integrator          =  sd
dt                  =  0.001    ; fs !
nsteps              =  2000000  ; total 2000 ps.
nstcomm             =  1
nstxout             =  1000
nstvout             =  1000
nstfout             =  0
nstlog              =  500
nstenergy           =  500
nstlist             =  10 
ns_type             =  grid
rlist               =  1.0
coulombtype             =  PME
rcoulomb            =  1.0
rvdw                =  1.4
fourierspacing          =  0.12
fourier_nx              =  0
fourier_ny              =  0
fourier_nz              =  0
pme_order               =  6
ewald_rtol              =  1e-5
optimize_fft            =  yes
energygrps              =  system
; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in three groups
Tcoupl              =  berendsen
tau_t               = 0.2    
tc_grps             = System 
ref_t               = 298    
; Pressure coupling is on
Pcoupl              =  berendsen
pcoupltype          =  isotropic
tau_p               =  0.5
compressibility     =  11.2e-5
ref_p               =  1.0
; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
gen_vel             =  no
gen_temp            =  298.0
gen_seed            =  173529
; Energy group exclusion
energygrp_excl      =  
freezegrps          =  
freezedim           =  
; Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics
acc_grps            =  
accelarate          =  
; center of mass
comm_mode           = 
comm_grps           =

> Dear Aymeric:
>
> 1. Can we please see the entire .mdp files for both simulations? I  
> suggest that you use a tau_t=1.0 (0.2 is probably over-damped).
>
> 2. Although any value of tau_t should still produce the correct  
> equilibria, your diffusion rates and your overall sampling may be  
> slower with sd tau_t=0.2 than they are with md.
>
> 3. Can you reproduce this effect with a box of water?
>
>> -- original message --
>>
>> I'm simulating a box of cyclohexane (GROMOS 53a6, 512 molecules, 298K,
>> compressibility=11.2 10-5 bar-,1 tau_p=0.5 ps, no constraints on bonds).
>> After equilibration and NPT simulation, the system reaches the proper
>> density reported for the model (791g/L). When I switch to a stochastic
>> integrator (with inverse friction coeff. tau_t=0.2 ps) the density
>> rapidly falls to about 765g/L, the potential energy increases, while
>> temperature and pressure fluctuate much more around their specified
>> values. I intend to use this box of cyclohexane for solvation free
>> energy calculations. Can anyone explain what is going on?
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Aymeric

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: anaome.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 318 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20100201/eb2e2a33/anaome-0001.vcf

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:21:05 +0100
From: Berk Hess <g...@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Re: density problems when switching from md
        to sd   integrator
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <col113-w5083351cc512a074c196978e...@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Hi,

This force field was designed to be used with constraints.
First try running with constraints set to all-bonds and without -DFLEXIBLE and 
check
the densities again.

Berk

> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:58:44 +0100
> From: ana...@fundp.ac.be
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: [gmx-users] Re: density problems when switching from md to sd        
> integrator
> 
> I have changed tau_t=0.2 for 1.0 but the density is not restored. I have 
> tried with the parameters from Villa and Mark (J Comput Chem, 2002, 23, 548)
> , tau_t=0.2 and tau_p=2.0 and still get the same density. The self-diffusion 
> coefficient is indeed half of that with md with sd and tau_t=0.2 (0.71 vs. 
> 1.48 10-5 cm2/s)
> and about the same with tau_t=1.0 (1.57 10-5 cm2/s). Water is less affected 
> (1009 g/L with md and 1007 g/L with sd and tau_t=0.2). What is the reason why 
> the density is lowered?
> 
> Here is the .mdp file (for the simulation with md, tau_t=0.1):
> 
> title             =  cyclohexane
> cpp                 =  /lib/cpp -traditional 
> define              =  -DFLEXIBLE
> constraints         =  none
> integrator          =  sd
> dt                  =  0.001  ; fs !
> nsteps              =  2000000        ; total 2000 ps.
> nstcomm             =  1
> nstxout             =  1000
> nstvout             =  1000
> nstfout             =  0
> nstlog              =  500
> nstenergy           =  500
> nstlist             =  10 
> ns_type             =  grid
> rlist               =  1.0
> coulombtype           =  PME
> rcoulomb            =  1.0
> rvdw                =  1.4
> fourierspacing                =  0.12
> fourier_nx            =  0
> fourier_ny            =  0
> fourier_nz            =  0
> pme_order             =  6
> ewald_rtol            =  1e-5
> optimize_fft          =  yes
> energygrps            =  system
> ; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in three groups
> Tcoupl              =  berendsen
> tau_t               = 0.2    
> tc_grps                   = System 
> ref_t               = 298    
> ; Pressure coupling is on
> Pcoupl              =  berendsen
> pcoupltype          =  isotropic
> tau_p               =  0.5
> compressibility     =  11.2e-5
> ref_p               =  1.0
> ; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
> gen_vel             =  no
> gen_temp            =  298.0
> gen_seed            =  173529
> ; Energy group exclusion
> energygrp_excl      =  
> freezegrps          =  
> freezedim           =  
> ; Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics
> acc_grps          =  
> accelarate        =  
> ; center of mass
> comm_mode           = 
> comm_grps           =
> 
> > Dear Aymeric:
> >
> > 1. Can we please see the entire .mdp files for both simulations? I  
> > suggest that you use a tau_t=1.0 (0.2 is probably over-damped).
> >
> > 2. Although any value of tau_t should still produce the correct  
> > equilibria, your diffusion rates and your overall sampling may be  
> > slower with sd tau_t=0.2 than they are with md.
> >
> > 3. Can you reproduce this effect with a box of water?
> >
> >> -- original message --
> >>
> >> I'm simulating a box of cyclohexane (GROMOS 53a6, 512 molecules, 298K,
> >> compressibility=11.2 10-5 bar-,1 tau_p=0.5 ps, no constraints on bonds).
> >> After equilibration and NPT simulation, the system reaches the proper
> >> density reported for the model (791g/L). When I switch to a stochastic
> >> integrator (with inverse friction coeff. tau_t=0.2 ps) the density
> >> rapidly falls to about 765g/L, the potential energy increases, while
> >> temperature and pressure fluctuate much more around their specified
> >> values. I intend to use this box of cyclohexane for solvation free
> >> energy calculations. Can anyone explain what is going on?
> >> Thanks in advance
> >>
> >> Aymeric
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
http://windows.microsoft.com/shop
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20100201/9a67608c/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:32:39 +0100
From: ms <deviceran...@gmail.com>
Subject: [gmx-users] [OT] Software package for discontinuous molecular
        dynamics? (DMD)
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4b66f417.5090...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

Sorry for the offtopic but Google/literature quick search is not helping
and I'd like to have some more informed opinion.

To my understanding, GROMACS isn't capable of discontinuous molecular
dynamics. Is there any more-or-less standard software package for that?

thank you!
m.


------------------------------

-- 
gmx-users mailing list
gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!

End of gmx-users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 7
****************************************

<<winmail.dat>>

-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to