Respected experts
Thank you a lot for your valuable suggestions for my previous mail.
 
Taking your advice I used SPCE water model with ffg43a1 forcefield. I modified 
the non bonded parameters for oxygen-water interaction taking the parameters 
from CRC as a source in the nonbonded parameter file. 
 
In the non-bonded parameter section I entered the values for oxygen and water 
using Lorentz-Bertholet rule but forgot to enter the values for water and water 
oxygen interaction. With that change I prepared a system of one oxygen in 508 
molecules of water inside a 2.5 nm cubic box. I saw that the density of the 
system was 997.8 kg/m3 close to what I want for 298 K. The system was energy 
minimized and I got a straight line having negative slope in the negative 
energy region with an average negative value.
 
Is my system not in local equilibrium because I suspect I should get a 
horizontal line in the negative region?
 
Thinking that i would give a try, I simulated the system directly in NVT 
ensemble at equilibration temperature 298 K (Berendsen). I ran the system for 
100 ns. I fitted the data for first 50 ns and got the diffusion coefficient of 
0.38 vs 2.4 unit. I have attached graph in this mail.
 
Is it due to insufficient statistics ? Would you please suggest me some 
reference that clarifies this insufficiencey. If then, should I extend this run 
to some 50 ns more?
 
Or is it due to the fact that I forgot to enter the water-water interaction 
parameter. The self diffusion coefficient of water was 2.6 unit versus 2.3 unit.
 
Also, the density calculated by g_energy is different from that we calculate 
manually (i.e., total mass divided by box volume) why?
 
Thank you for your consideration and patience.
 
Neal
 


      
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to