Hi Nisha,

I have performed a benchmark simulations of TIP3P water and I still obtained density 0.984g.cm-3. It looks that this model gives such a density. If you look at JCP 79, 926, 1983 you will see that the authors got 0.982g.cm-3 with MC. (Table 3) Try to evaluate alsoo other properties, each model of water has some deficiencies. I tried large number of cut-offs combinations LJ and QQ tyoes of interactions, but the density did not gange by more than 0.001g.cm-3.

Greetings

Zuzana

Dňa 03/31/10, nishap.pa...@utoronto.ca napísal:
Hello,

    So I looked at the manual and I changed my mdp parameters as follows to equilibrate at a constant pressure.

 RUN CONTROL PARAMETERS =
integrator               = sd
tinit                    = 0
dt                       = 0.002
nsteps                   = 500000
nstcomm                  = 1
nstxout                  = 0
nstvout                  = 0
nstfout                  = 0
nstlog                   = 500
nstenergy                = 500
nstxtcout                = 0
xtc-precision            = 1000
nstlist                  = 5
ns_type                  = grid
pbc                      = xyz
rlist                    = 1.3
coulombtype              = pme
rcoulomb                 = 1.3
epsilon-r                = 1
vdw-type                 = switch
rvdw-switch              = 1.0
rvdw                     = 1.2
DispCorr                 = EnerPres
fourierspacing           = 0.1
fourier_nx               = 0
fourier_ny               = 0
fourier_nz               = 0
pme_order                = 6
ewald_rtol               = 1e-06
epsilon_surface          = 0
optimize_fft             = no
tc_grps                  = system
tau_t                    = 0.1
ref_t                    = 298
Pcoupl                   = berendsen
tau_p                    = 1.0
compressibility          = 4.5e-05
ref_p                    = 1.0
constraints              = all-bonds
constraint-algorithm     = Lincs
unconstrained-start      = no
lincs-order              = 4
lincs-warnangle          = 30
lincs-iter               = 1
gen_vel                  = yes
gen_temp                 = 298.0
gen_seed                 = 173529

I also tried using mdp parameters as mentioned in some of the gromacs tutorials. I ran this simulation for 1ns and I am still getting density around 985g/l, which is low for tip3p water (27nm^3, 900 water molecules). I checked some of the publications and the values they obtained were ~998g/l. I checked for vacuum in my system, but I didn't see anything out of the ordinary. Any insights?

Thanks

Nisha P



Quoting nishap.pa...@utoronto.ca:

>Thanks. I will look up the manual again.
>
>Quoting Sander Pronk <pr...@cbr.su.se>:
>
>>Hi Nisha,
>>
>>Looking at your .mdp, there are some issues that might lead to the
>>behavior that you describe:
>>First: you should try to look up the published densities for tip3p
>>water at 300K - they might actually be close to what you get.
>>Second: your neighbor list cut-off (rlist) might be too small to
>>fully contain the charge groups (check the manual, section 7.3.11).
>>Third: You haven't enabled long-range mean field correction for the
>>pressure or energy. Expect the pressure to be strongly dependent on
>>cut-off (see the same section).
>>
>>Sander
>>
>>
>>On Mar 30, 2010, at 22:47 , nishap.pa...@utoronto.ca wrote:
>>
>>>I have a box (3x3x3nm) of Tip3p water molecules ~900 and the
>>>density when I create the box using genbox is 997.177g/l. I did
>>>energy minimization run and the potential energy did converge
>>>smoothly, so I did NPT equilibration run of 100ps and I got the
>>>density value of 975g/l. Why does the density decrease after the
>>>run? these are the parameters that I used :
>>>
>>>RUN CONTROL PARAMETERS
>>>integrator               = md
>>>tinit                    = 0
>>>dt                       = 0.002
>>>nsteps                   = 50000
>>>nstcomm                  = 0
>>>nstxout                  = 0
>>>nstvout                  = 0
>>>nstfout                  = 0
>>>nstlog                   = 100
>>>nstenergy                = 100
>>>nstxtcout                = 0
>>>xtc_precision            = 1000
>>>nstlist                  = 5
>>>ns-type                  = Grid
>>>pbc                      = xyz
>>>rlist                    = 1.1
>>>coulombtype              = pme
>>>rcoulomb                 = 1.1
>>>epsilon-r                = 1
>>>vdw-type                 = switch
>>>rvdw-switch              = 0.8
>>>rvdw                     = 1.0
>>>Tcoupl                   = V-rescale
>>>tc-grps                  = System
>>>tau_t                    = 0.1
>>>ref_t                    = 300
>>>Pcoupl                   = berendsen
>>>tau_p                    = 0.5
>>>compressibility          = 4e-05
>>>ref_p                    = 1.0
>>>constraints              = all-bonds
>>>constraint-algorithm     = Lincs
>>>unconstrained-start      = no
>>>lincs-order              = 4
>>>lincs-iter               = 1
>>>lincs-warnangle          = 30
>>>
>>>Am I missing something?
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Nisha Patel
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
>>>http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>>>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>>www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>>>Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>
>>--
>>gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
>>http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>>Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>
>
>
>
>Nisha Patel
>MSc Candidate
>Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy
>Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
>144 College Street
>Room 1172
>Toronto, ON
>M5S 3M2
>Canada
>Telephone: 416-978-1536
>
>--
>gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
>http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>



Nisha Patel


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to