On 29/08/10 19:39, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

When dividing the energy of a system by the number of molecules (in a
homogeneous system), you are extracting what I believe is commonly
referred to as "configurational energy" which, for relatively simple
systems, should converge fairly quickly. The reason your total energy
values increase with system size is a simple matter of potential energy.
More interactions mean that the magnitude of the potential will
increase, and likewise with the kinetic energy, more particles that have
velocity imply a greater sum.

You can convince yourself of this fact by running relatively short
simulations of water boxes, using, i.e. spc216.gro and then a larger
construct from it. Within a few hundred ps, you should get reasonably
converged configurational energies, though of course the total energy
will be larger simply by virtue of the system size.

Energies are in kJ/mol, no question. The extrapolation would be that a
mole of a given species in the given configuration would have this
energy in kJ. For a single molecule, the energy is whatever value you
obtain divided by Avogadro's number, which is a relatively unimportant
quantity if you are interested in bulk dynamics.

Wait, now I am confused too.
I always understood that energy was meant as kJ/mol for a mol of my *system*, that is, if I have a box with 10 identical molecules, then I g_energy gives me out the energies of that *box*.

Is it wrong?

m.
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to