mohsen ramezanpour wrote:
Dear justin
I generated it by PRODRG server,and modifying Protein.top as it is in ENZYME/DRUG tutorial.
Actually I don't know where is problem.
Ok,I will modify my EM parameter to do a good energy minimization.

Back up and start over. PRODRG topologies (especially for a molecule as complex as yours) are generally of very poor quality. Garbage in, garbage out. Even if you manage to get the simulations running I wouldn't necessarily trust the outcome. Please see the paper linked from:

http://www.gromacs.org/Downloads/Related_Software/PRODRG#Tips

You may want to re-think the force field entirely. Gromos96 parameter sets are not particularly versatile when it comes to the types of functional groups that can be described, making correct topology generation somewhat difficult for most drug molecules.

-Justin

Thanks in advance

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu <mailto:jalem...@vt.edu>> wrote:



    mohsen ramezanpour wrote:

        I checked this one but it did not solve the problem.
        Actually I did in your way and I found the force is very high on
        one atom of my ligand,C12.
        I checked it's structure with pymol,it 's situation was normal.
        can I change it's coordinate a few?
        I think it can make force less.
        please let me know how can i do


    Making ad hoc changes to coordinates is a bad idea.  What you might
    gain by relaxing nonbonded forces you might strain within the
    molecule (bonded interactions).  Proper energy minimization should
    resolve any high forces.

    What is your ligand?  How did you generate its topology?  Poor
    parameters can also give bad contacts and forces.

    -Justin

        thanks in advance


        On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:22 PM, mohsen ramezanpour
        <ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com
        <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com>
        <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com
        <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com>>> wrote:




           On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Mark Abraham
           <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>
        <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
        <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>>> wrote:

               On 12/01/2011 9:37 PM, mohsen ramezanpour wrote:

                   Dear Dr,Tsjerk
                   I want to estimate protein-drug binding free energy.
                   I am using umbrella sampling for this mean.
                   my drug is inside of a hole in protein. then I have
            to rotate
                   my system to can fit the pulling line along one box axis.
                   besides I have to pull drug not at direction which
            connect COM
                   of protein and drug,but it is better to pull it along
            line
                   which connects drug to
                   a residue inside of hole.


               I would

               1) take my starting bound configuration,
               2) strip away anything except the protein complex,
               3) delete the box information,
               4) rotate the complex with editconf until I was happy
        with its
               orientation,
               5) then generate a suitable box around that orientation,
               6) do EM
               7) solvate and neutralize
               8) do EM
               9) etc.

               Mark
               Dear Mark

           thanks for your reply
           I will check this ways too.



                   I rotated box with editconf ,solvated system with
                   genbox,neutralized with genion,
                   now I want to generate NPT and then generating
            configuration
                   as umbrella sampling tutorial.



                   On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar
                   <tsje...@gmail.com <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com>
            <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com>>> wrote:

                       Hi Mohsen,

                       You're doing something terribly wrong. But why
            you want to
                       do what you
                       attempt eludes me. Maybe it helps if you give an
                       explanation of what
                       you want, in stead of what doesn't work. In
            addition, give
                       the set of
                       commands that bring you up to this point, and not
            only the
                       output of
                       mdrun. That way we can probably see where you go
            astray.

                       Cheers,

                       Tsjerk


                       On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, mohsen ramezanpour
                       <ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com
            <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com>
                       <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com
            <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
                       >
                       > Dear Dr.Tsjerk
                       >
                       > Before doing md for generating NPT, I did an EM,the
                       result was:
                       > poteintial energy:-2.2611160*10^(6)
                       > Max F=4.8960352*10^(4) on atom 5289
                       > Besides I had done EM before on the same
            system,I just
                       add solvent by genbox
                       > and Ions by genion.
                       > the above result is for Energy minimization
            after adding
                       ions by genion.
                       >
                       > I did what you said.but when I was generating NPT
                       equilibration
                       > I recieved this massage:
                       >
                       >
                       > Step 0, time 0 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
                       > relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
                       > rms 8.387059, max 321.381958 (between atoms
            5289 and 5290)
                       > bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
                       >  atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current,
            constraint length
> 5293 5294 74.4 0.1137 12.9330 0.1090 > 5291 5293 59.1 0.1422 32.1605 0.1390 > 5291 5292 103.5 0.1096 9.8747 0.1090 > 5289 5291 89.5 0.1383 39.2022 0.1390 > 5289 5290 85.7 0.1410 43.8439 0.1360 > 5289 5287 85.4 0.1426 44.0196 0.1390 > 5287 5288 90.2 0.1091 1.5178 0.1090 > 5285 5287 88.7 0.1391 1.9186 0.1390 > 5285 5286 41.8 0.1092 0.1322 0.1090 > 5284 5293 87.2 0.1429 21.7425 0.1390 > 5284 5285 92.4 0.1393 2.0880 0.1390 > 5277 5278 79.1 0.1532 0.5213 0.1530 > 5276 5284 63.0 0.1394 1.8946 0.1390 > 5276 5277 79.2 0.1534 0.7278 0.1530 > 5276 5275 79.9 0.1432 0.6036 0.1430 > 5274 5275 82.0 0.1431 0.3189 0.1430 > 5276 5272 82.1 0.1393 0.6113 0.1390 > 5272 5273 74.2 0.1333 0.2251 0.1330 > 5272 5270 77.7 0.1332 0.2428 0.1330 > 5270 5271 46.5 0.1091 0.1682 0.1090 > 5268 5270 36.9 0.1391 0.1854 0.1390 > 5273 5266 41.4 0.1334 0.1933 0.1330
                       > Wrote pdb files with previous and current
            coordinates
                       > step 0Warning: 1-4 interaction between 5272 and
            5293 at
                       distance 22.443
                       > which is larger than the 1-4 table size 2.400 nm
                       > These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
                       > This usually means your system is exploding,
                       > if not, you should increase table-extension in
            your mdp file
                       > or with user tables increase the table size
                       >
                       > Please let me know what can I do.
                       > thanks in advance
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       >
                       > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar
                       <tsje...@gmail.com <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com>
            <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
                       >>
                       >> Hi Mohsen,
                       >>
                       >> I think rotating a molecule with editconf will not
                       rotate the box. Then
                       >> again, if it did, it would result in a box
            violating
                       Gromacs requirements.
                       >> Either way, it's not going to work like that.
            Build a
                       new box after
                       >> rotation... And have a good look at what you're
                       actually trying now by
                       >> taking the rotated system and stack it a few times
                       using genconf -nbox 2 2 2
                       >>
                       >> Cheers,
                       >>
                       >> Tsjerk
                       >>
                       >> On Jan 6, 2011 7:22 PM, "mohsen ramezanpour"
                       >> <ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com
            <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com>
                       <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com
            <mailto:ramezanpour.moh...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
                       >>
                       >> Dear Amit
                       >> I entered these commands for rotating box:
>> editconf -f conf.gro -o output.pdb -rotate 0 0 25.4
                       >> and then:
>> editconf -f output.pdb -o newbox.pdb -rotate 0 127.67548 0
                       >> as a result my molecul is located out of box
            totally,of
                       course drug and
                       >> protein are bind to eachother yet.
                       >> thanks in advance for your attention and reply
                       >>
                       >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Amit Choubey
                       <kgp.a...@gmail.com <mailto:kgp.a...@gmail.com>
            <mailto:kgp.a...@gmail.com <mailto:kgp.a...@gmail.com>>>
            wrote: >
                       >> > Could you post the e...
                       >>
                       >> --
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>

                       >>
            http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
                       >> Please search the archive at
                       >>
            http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
                       before posting!
                       >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to
            the list.
                       Use the
                       >> www interface or send it to
                       gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>>.

                       >> Can't post? Read
                       http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
                       >>
                       >> --
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>

                       >>
            http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
                       >> Please search the archive at
                       >>
            http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
                       before posting!
                       >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to
            the list.
                       Use the
                       >> www interface or send it to
                       gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>>.

                       >> Can't post? Read
                       http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
                       >
                       >
                       > --
                       > gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>

                       > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
                       > Please search the archive at
                       > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
                       before posting!
                       > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
            list.
                       Use the
                       > www interface or send it to
                       gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>>.

                       > Can't post? Read
                       http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
                       >



                       --
                       Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

                       post-doctoral researcher
                       Molecular Dynamics Group
                       * Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and
                       Biotechnology
                       * Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
                       University of Groningen
                       The Netherlands
                       --
                       gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>

                       http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
                       Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
                       posting!
                       Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
            list. Use the
                       www interface or send it to
            gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>
                       <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>>.

                       Can't post? Read
            http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




               --
               gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
               <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>

               http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
               Please search the archive at
               http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
        before posting!
               Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
               www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>
               <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>>.

               Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- ========================================

    Justin A. Lemkul
    Ph.D. Candidate
    ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
    MILES-IGERT Trainee
    Department of Biochemistry
    Virginia Tech
    Blacksburg, VA
    jalemkul[at]vt.edu <http://vt.edu> | (540) 231-9080
    http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

    ========================================
-- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
    interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to