On 5/04/2011 9:59 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:
Dear Mark,

Now, are the files correct?

They're well-formed, but you've not taken Tsjerk's advice and arranged for (COH)3(NH3+)C to have charges consistent with its symmetry. When people donate their time to you, please use it or demonstrate why you shouldn't :-)

Mark

*EDO.itp*:
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
EDO      3

[ atoms ]
;   nr      type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge     mass
     1        OA     1  EDO     OAB     1   -0.111  15.9994
     2         H       1  EDO     HAE     1    0.031   1.0080
     3       CH2     1  EDO     CAA     1    0.080  14.0270
     4       CH2     1  EDO     CAC *2*    0.080  14.0270
     5        OA     1  EDO     OAD *2*   -0.111  15.9994
     6         H       1  EDO     HAF *2 *   0.031   1.0080

*TRS.itp:*
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
TRS      3

[ atoms ]
;   nr      type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge     mass
     1        OA     1  TRS      O1     1   -0.119  15.9994
     2         H     1  TRS      H13     1    0.032   1.0080
     3       CH2     1  TRS      C1     1    0.087  14.0270
     4      CCl4     1  TRS        C *3*    0.055  12.0110
     5       CH2     1  TRS      C3 *4 *   0.049  14.0270
     6        OA     1  TRS      O3 *4*   -0.205  15.9994
     7         H     1  TRS      H33 *4*    0.019   1.0080
     8        NL     1  TRS         N *5*    0.206  14.0067
     9         H     1  TRS         H2 *5*    0.004   1.0080
    10         H     1  TRS        H3 *5*    0.004   1.0080
    11         H     1  TRS        H1 *5 *  0.004   1.0080
    12       CH2     1  TRS      C2 *6 *   0.150  14.0270
    13        OA     1  TRS      O2 *6*   -0.205  15.9994
    14         H     1  TRS      H23 *6*    0.019   1.0080

Thanks for your helps

05 Nisan 2011 09:03 tarihinde Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>> yazdı:

    On 5/04/2011 3:57 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:
    Dear Tsjerk,

        Hi Ahmet,

        As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
        charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have
        zero charge,
        nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups
        for EDO,
        which will have zero net charge each, and for TRS I'd take
        the COH
        groups as separate charge groups. I also note that the COH
        groups,
        although chemically identical - H3NC(COH)3, right?-, have
        different
        charges. That doesn't seem proper.

        Hope it helps,

        Tsjerk


    nonrevised .itp file:
    EDO      3

    [ atoms ]
    ;   nr      type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge     mass
         1        OA     1  EDO     OAB     1   -0.111  15.9994
         2         H     1  EDO     HAE     1    0.031   1.0080
         3       CH2     1  EDO     CAA     1    0.080  14.0270
         4       CH2     1  EDO     CAC     1    0.080  14.0270
         5        OA     1  EDO     OAD     1   -0.111  15.9994
         6         H     1  EDO     HAF     1    0.031   1.0080

    nonrevised .itp file:
    EDO      3

    [ atoms ]
    ;   nr      type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge     mass
         1        OA     1  EDO     OAB     1   -0.111  15.9994
         2         H     1  EDO     HAE     1    0.031   1.0080
         3       CH2     1  EDO     CAA     1 *0.000*  14.0270
         4       CH2     1  EDO     CAC     1 *0.000*  14.0270
         5        OA     1  EDO     OAD     1   -0.111  15.9994
         6         H     1  EDO     HAF     1    0.031   1.0080

    can you show me on the itp file? how do I seperate two COH
    groups? Please help me

    We didn't say to use zero *charges*. We said you need small charge
    groups. Since EDO is neutral, then by symmetry each half must also
    be neutral.

    Have a look at the way charge groups are used in the .rtp file for
    your forcefield. You need to do similar things. If you don't
    understand the file formats yet, you need to read up on chapter 5
    of the manual.

    Mark

    --
    gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
Ahmet YILDIRIM

-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to