Sorry, ignore my last post, only just realised you had set your probe to 0 
radius.

Catch ya,

Dr. Dallas Warren
Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Action
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3010
dallas.war...@monash.edu
+61 3 9903 9304
---------------------------------
When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail.

From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On 
Behalf Of Jacob Alan Spooner
Sent: Tuesday, 15 November 2011 11:29 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Questionable van der waals volumes from g_sas

Hello gmx-users

I have been attempting to obtain van der Waal's volumes using the g_sas 
utility.  The command I use to do so is something like

g_sas -f hexane.gro -s topol.tpr -probe 0 -tv V_vdw.xvg

This seems to give reasonable results for most of my test systems, however when 
I run the command on an optimized structure of cyclohexane I get a larger van 
der Waal's volume than that of n-hexane.  I think this has to do with the fact 
that the surface calculation method used in g_sas is missing the void in the 
centre of the ring.  In order to test this I increased the size of the ring, 
calculating the volumes of icosane and cycloicosane.  I found that in this case 
the volume of the cyclic molecule was expectedly smaller.  I tried increasing 
the number of dots used to draw the dot-surface but saw no significant change 
in the volumes.

Therefore my question is if anybody is familiar enough with g_sas to help me 
understand why the surface calculation method is not giving sensible values for 
these smaller ring systems.  Also I am wondering if anybody can suggest any 
other free software that would allow me to compute van der Waal's and Solvent 
Excluded volumes.

Thanks in advance.

Jake Spooner
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to