On 12/01/2012 9:14 PM, Matthias Ernst wrote:
Hi,

I have some questions.
First, what dihedral angles will Gromacs produce and use in topology when simulating proteins? To be more specific, I was looking for psi (N-C(a)-C-N) and phi (C-N-C(a)-C) angles in all the dihedrals that were generated by pdb2gmx. I only found the psi angles but not phi. Is that by purpose?

If your force field doesn't implement such dihedrals, then they won't be there. However it seems to me more likely that you aren't looking in enough right places. Consider the opposite order of the atom numbers, also.

Second, for testing purposes, I want to do single point energy calculations in vacuo with no cutoffs at given coordinates. When I use an mdp like the one below, it always changes the coordinates slightly but enough to change the energy values noticeably. Is there a better way to to this?

Zero-step MD is a way to do this. Using constraints = none, or continuation = yes will stop slight changes from the use of constraints. Another alternative is using mdrun -rerun, which is efficient for doing many such evaluations, and guarantees no changes to the coordinates.

Third, I'm not sure if the coordinates are used correctly. To compare the energy values, I inserted a little piece of code in the energy evaluation routines which outputs the coordinates of all atoms. It seems that everything beyond the three digits after the decimal sign in the .gro files is filled with arbitrary numbers. I know that using floating point data types results in a loss of accuracy but I thought even with single precision, the accuracy should be higher than three digits?

The accuracy is as high as it can be - I think you're assuming nothing has happened, and that isn't quite true.

Mark


Here is my mdp:
constraints   =       all-bonds
integrator    =       MD
nsteps          =       0
nstcomm     =       1
ns_type        =       grid
rlist              =       0.0
rcoulomb     =       0.0
rvdw            =       0.0
Tcoupl          =       no
Pcoupl         =       no
gen_vel        =       no
pbc              =       no

I would greatly appreciate any help and comments.

Best regards,
Matthias Ernst

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to