Dear Tsjerk,

Thanks very much indeed for confirming this, really appreciate it. I will do as 
you suggest to have a more thorough check.

Best wishes,
Huiwen

From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On 
Behalf Of Tsjerk Wassenaar
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:08 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] questions on distance restraints


Hi Huiwen,

Your approach seems good. Information about the distance restraints will be 
printed in the log file from mdrun, or can be extracted from the .edr file. You 
can also work your way through the information in the .tpr file given by 
gmxdump to see if they are indeed properly defined.

Cheers,

Tsjerk
On Jan 18, 2012 1:46 AM, "NG HUI WEN" 
<huiwen...@nottingham.edu.my<mailto:huiwen...@nottingham.edu.my>> wrote:
Dear gmxusers,

I have some questions about distance restraints that I hope you would be able 
to shed some light on. Thanks in advance.

I am trying to apply distance restraints to my protein. Below was what I did:


-use genrestr to create my ca_disre.itp
genrestr -f membedded_em.gro -o ca_disre.itp -disre (pop-up prompt: CA atoms 
selected)

-in my mdp file
I added this line near the top:
define          = -DDISRES

-my  top file looks like that
; Include forcefield parameters
#include "gromos53a6_lipid.ff/forcefield.itp"

;Include Protein Topology
#include "A2a.itp"

; Include Position restraint file
#ifdef DISRES
#include "ca_disre.itp"
#endif
;
#ifdef POSRES
#include "posre.itp"
#endif
;

;Include POPC topology
#include "popc.itp"
#ifdef LIPID_POSRES
#include "lipid_posre.itp"
#endif

;Include water topology
#include "gromos53a6_lipid.ff/spc.itp"

#ifdef POSRES_WATER
; Position restraint for each water oxygen
[ position_restraints ]
;  i funct       fcx        fcy        fcz
   1    1       1000       1000       1000
#endif

; Include topology for ions
#include "gromos53a6_lipid.ff/ions.itp"

[ system ]
; Name
Protein and POPC and Water

[ molecules ]
; Compound        #mols
Protein_chain_X     1
POPC              327
SOL         24767
CL          11

The simulation ran without a problem. However, after it was completed, I 
compared the final protein structure with the initial and it looked like the 
atoms (even the CA atoms , especially those in the loops) had moved quite a 
fair bit away from the original position. This made me wonder if the distance 
restraints had indeed been applied or perhaps the force constant was not large 
enough (default =1000 kJ/mol/nm^2)?  I had checked the mdout.mdp file "define  
= -DDISRES" was there... wasn't sure how else I could check this.

To test whether it was due to the latter, I had tried rerunning the simulation 
for 1ns simulation with "disre_fc        = 10000" added to the mdp file. This 
time the atoms did not move as far away as previously observed.

I have tried google-ing for the proper way to impose distance restraints but 
didn't find my searches too useful. I wonder if anyone could confirm with me 
that the above method is correct/ tell me that I had done something wrong.

Cheers for that!

Best wishes,
Huiwen



<<

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may 
contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, 
please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy 
or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any 
views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily 
reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may 
still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are 
advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of 
Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK & Malaysia legislation.
>>

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org<mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to 
gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org<mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
<< This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and 
may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in 
error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, 
copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any 
attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not 
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. 

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may 
still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are 
advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of 
Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK & Malaysia legislation. >>
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to