On 6/04/2012 9:05 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 6/04/2012 8:27 PM, rama david wrote:
Hi Gromacs Friends and Justin ,
Thank you for reply and suggestion.
These is short part of my PDB .
ATOM 1 1H ACE 1 0.000 0.000 0.000
ATOM 2 CH3 ACE 1 0.000 1.090 0.000
ATOM 3 2H ACE 1 1.028 1.453 -0.000
ATOM 4 3H ACE 1 -0.514 1.453 -0.890
ATOM 5 C ACE 1 -0.721 1.600 1.249
ATOM 6 O ACE 1 -0.839 2.806 1.453
ATOM 7 N PRO 2 -1.227 0.727 2.126
ATOM 8 CA PRO 2 -1.918 1.181 3.321
ATOM 9 HA PRO 2 -2.553 2.031 3.073
ATOM 10 C PRO 2 -0.928 1.587 4.404
ATOM 11 O PRO 2 -1.069 2.645 5.013
ATOM 12 CB PRO 2 -2.782 0.075 3.851
ATOM 13 1HB PRO 2 -2.469 -0.177 4.864
ATOM 14 2HB PRO 2 -3.822 0.401 3.862
ATOM 15 CG PRO 2 -2.645 -1.140 2.964
ATOM 16 1HG PRO 2 -2.232 -1.966 3.542
ATOM 17 2HG PRO 2 -3.606 -1.451 2.556
ATOM 18 CD PRO 2 -1.680 -0.755 1.882
ATOM 19 1HD PRO 2 -2.173 -0.830 0.913
ATOM 20 2HD PRO 2 -0.816 -1.419 1.895
ATOM 21 N GLY 3 0.076 0.740 4.644
ATOM 22 H GLY 3 0.135 -0.114 4.109
ATOM 23 CA GLY 3 1.083 1.012 5.650
The gromacs96 53a6 .rtp file mention the following data...
bondedtypes ]
; bonds angles dihedrals impropers
2 2 1 2
[ ACE ]
[ atoms ]
CA CH3 0.000 0
C C 0.450 1
O O -0.450 1
[ bonds ]
C CA gb_27
C O gb_5
C +N gb_19
[ angles ]
CA C O ga_30
CA C +N ga_19
O C +N ga_33
[ impropers ]
C CA +N O gi_1
[ NH2 ]
[ atoms ]
N NT -0.83 0
H1 H 0.415 0
H2 H 0.415 0
[ bonds ]
N H1 gb_2
N H2 gb_2
-C N gb_9
[ angles ]
-O -C N ga_33
-CA -C N ga_19
-C N H1 ga_23
-C N H2 ga_23
H1 N H2 ga_24
[ dihedrals ]
-CA -C N H1 gd_14
[ impropers ]
-C -O N -CA gi_1
N H1 H2 -C gi_1
As per my pdb file N atom is the part of PROLINE , not the ACE...
I got the topology by using the Amber 03 FF.
But my priority is to the GROMOS96 53a6 force field ...
Could any suggest me the way to tackle these problem???
The default is to try to put termini on the protein chain. Your chain
already has them, so you need to tell pdb2gmx not to try to add
termini. See pdb2gmx -h.
... and if you'd also shown the last piece of your pdb2gmx output and
given us the whole command line you used, then you'd have gotten your
answer faster and wasted less of people's time guessing what the real
problem was.
Mark
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
