On 6/27/12 1:35 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
I know it's much better to use a non-deprecated ff. But what could I do? I
have to regenerate the results of simulation done by gmx.ff . Aren't there any
solution to pass this step?
I have no idea how to make gmx.ff work. I "solved" the issue by commenting out
the line and seeing that no error resulted. This, of course, isn't an actual
solution, just a debugging method. The force field defines its impropers in an
odd way, and as such I don't know that there is a workaround.
I PROMISE YOU AND ME TO REPEAT THE SIMULATION WHIT A MODERN FF AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE :)
The sooner, the better. This is an ancient force field, and vastly better
parameter sets exist.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
