On 7/18/12 5:51 PM, Rajat Desikan wrote:
"54A7 also introduced changes to the Gromos96 lipid parameters"
How will this change my inclusion of the berger lipid parameters? Any thing
that I should pay special attention to? Are there other lipid parameters
more compatible?

There are better force fields for lipids, but they require the use of CHARMM. There may be other suitable united atom force fields. My comment was intentionally generic; I don't know how well 54A7 pairs with the Berger parameters. In theory, it should be fine, but since Gromos96 parameters for lipids have been tweaked, maybe the balance of forces in the parameters for proteins and lipids will be affected. There was a new lipid atom type introduced to make Gromos96 lipids better. They're still not as good as CHARMM, though.

I heard from a faculty member at our Institute that the 53a6 is a bad ff for
a protein with a lot of alpha helices for longer simulations. She apparently
saw the helices unravel when they were supposed to be stable.


This is a hot topic. Conventional wisdom does demonstrate that 53A6 destabilizes helices, but others will contend that 53A6 is perfectly suitable for reproducing many experimental observables, including NMR signals. I tend to think that there is some bias, but all force fields have shortcomings. 54A7 is certainly better in terms of helical stabilization, from what I can see.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to