What I think is that anisotropic coupling may be 
faster in equilibrium. Suppose the protein is quite different in x and y 
dimensions, after  insertion, I think it is faster to get equilibrium 
the box length separately. I agree with you that semi-isotropic coupling in the 
first step can also do the job, but I expect it may take longer 
time to reach equilibrium. 


--Jianguo

________________________________
From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
To: Jianguo Li <ljg...@yahoo.com.sg>; Discussion list for GROMACS users 
<gmx-users@gromacs.org> 
Sent: Friday, 17 August 2012, 9:19
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Protein-POPC bilayer



On 8/16/12 9:14 PM, Jianguo Li wrote:
> After inserting the protein, the equilibrium box length in the x and y 
> dimension should be different, so you need anisotropic pressure coupling 
> during the 1st step. After equilibrium, the ratio of box length in x,y is 
> fixed, so you can use semi-isotropic method.
> 

Most pre-equilibrated bilayers have (roughly) equivalent x and y box 
dimensions.  Why do you think they should inherently be different?

In my experience, anisotropic coupling leads to major deformations in the x-y 
plane, taking a bilayer that is initially a square (roughly) in the x-y plane 
and turning it into a rectangle.  I'd be very curious to hear Peter's answer to 
this question.  I used to use anisotropic coupling, but now I use semiisotropic 
exclusively.

-Justin

-- ========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to