Yep You are right. I will try my best to change the files accordingly.
Thanks 

> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:05:20 -0400
> From: jalem...@vt.edu
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] error with x2top.
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/25/12 5:02 PM, Elie M wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. I guess either way (x2top or pdb2gmx), I have 
> > problems.  pdb2gmx is giving the same old error residue 'UNK' is not found 
> > in topology residue file whereas strangely enough x2top did not complain 
> > and was able to assign topologies for 73 atoms out of 94 so maybe it is 
> > easier to use x2top because in the other case I have to change files and I 
> > have no experience in this whatsoever and I am really tight on time. What 
> > do you personally think?
> >
> 
> Neither tool is guaranteed to produce a topology for an arbitrary molecule.  
> If 
> g_x2top does not have the right parameters, it will fail.  If pdb2gmx does 
> not 
> have the right parameters, it will fail.  g_x2top further assumes that some 
> generic set of atom types and functional groups will address whatever it is 
> that 
> you're working with.  Sometimes that's appropriate, sometimes it's not.  
> Either 
> way, you're going to have to modify either the .n2t file or the .rtp file for 
> your chosen force field.  Regardless of the route you choose, you're going to 
> have to come up with parameters for your molecule and learn how these files 
> work 
> so you can modify them.  Parameterization is an expert topic for a reason.
> 
> -Justin
> 
> -- 
> ========================================
> 
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Research Scientist
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
> 
> ========================================
> -- 
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
                                          --
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to