On 12/5/12 12:57 PM, James Starlight wrote:
Dear Gromacs Users!


In one of my study I investigate interactions of the cyclic
nucleotides (cGMP and cAMP) with some cyclic-nucleotide-binding
proteins. I'm modelling that complexes in the gromos 56a7 ff with the
parameters for ligands made by prodrg.  So I'm not quite sure about
correctness of charge distributions of that cyclic nucleotides. E.g
below charges of my mollecule of cGMP (united atom modell) is present.


;   nr      type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge     mass
      1         O     1  DRG      O6     7   -0.211  15.9994
      2         C     1  DRG      C6     7    0.211  12.0110
      3        NR     1  DRG      N1     8   -0.360  14.0067
      4         H     1  DRG      H1     8    0.360   1.0080
      5         C     1  DRG      C2     1    0.298  12.0110
      6        NT     1  DRG      N2     6   -0.830  14.0067
      7         H     1  DRG     H22     6    0.415   1.0080
      8         H     1  DRG     H21     6    0.415   1.0080
      9        NR     1  DRG      N3     1   -0.298  14.0067
     10         C     1  DRG      C4     2    0.210  12.0110
     11         C     1  DRG      C5     2    0.096  12.0110
     12        NR     1  DRG      N7     2   -0.626  14.0067
     13       CR1     1  DRG      C8     2   -0.030  12.0110
     14        HC     1  DRG      H8     2    0.006   1.0080
     15        NR     1  DRG      N9     2    0.179  14.0067
     16       CH1     1  DRG     C1*     2    0.165  13.0190
     17        OA     1  DRG     O4*     3   -0.176  15.9994
     18       CH1     1  DRG     C4*     3    0.240  13.0190
     19       CH1     1  DRG     C5*     3    0.089  14.0270
     20        OA     1  DRG     O5*     3   -0.177  15.9994
     21         P     1  DRG     PAQ     9    1.360  30.9738
     22        OA     1  DRG     OAR     9   -0.797  15.9994
     23        OM     1  DRG     OAS     9   -1.539  15.9994
     24        OA     1  DRG     O3*     4   -0.160  15.9994
     25       CH1     1  DRG     C3*     4    0.160  13.0190
     26       CH1     1  DRG     C2*     5    0.150  13.0190
     27        OA     1  DRG     O2*     5   -0.548  15.9994
     28         H     1  DRG     H8M     5    0.398   1.0080



Have anobody else modelled the same cyclic nucleotides in gromos ff ?

Is there any particular reason you're using Gromos96 instead of say, AMBER or CHARMM? The latter perform significantly better than Gromos.

I'd like to compare my itp's of ligands with another works :)


At quick glance and without knowing what the ligand you've shown actually is, the charges look reasonable for the 43A1 parameter set, but I don't know which you're trying to actually use - 56A7 doesn't exist as far as I know. Do you mean 53A6 or 54A7? If so, the charges do not seem right.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to