On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM, James Starlight <jmsstarli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> That paper suggests of using 1.0 nm for all cut-offs > http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct200491c > > that seems strange to me because with gromos-56 I've used 1.2 nm cutoffs. > > And what was your basis for that decision? What makes you think that AMBER99 can even be combined with the Berger lipid force field? -Justin -- ======================================== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin ======================================== -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
