'extern "C" {
double x = (double)roundl((double)y);
}'
should do.Mateusz Loskot wrote: > Rob Savoye wrote: >> Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>> Rob Savoye wrote: >>>> Markus Gothe wrote: >>>>> GCC is a gnuism with it's own non-iso extensions, not a real compiler >>>>> for except x86-based systems imo. ;) >>> Honestly, I was hoping Rob will tell us the truth about it :-) >> Actually, since I avoid using the extensions, > > Yes. > >> what's left is a nicely ANSI conforming C++ compiler, >> especially if you use the newer 4.x version. > > Right. > The only think that's missing for me is to get rid of problem described > here (casting pointer-to-function to pointer-to-object, and vice versa): > > http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2004/12/problem-with-dlsym/ > > but this problem applies to C++ Standard than to particular compiler. > But GCC could be nice and fix it even then :-) > >> I find this statement amusing, as for many years most people >> thought it worked better on all the non x86 architectures. :-) The x86 >> really only started to catch up with GCC 3.x. >> >> Personally, it's VC++ that I find obnoxious, as it doesn't even really >> support the ANSI C++ spec. > > I found Visual C++ 2005 as well supporting ANSI C++. > However, it's a crap because does not support C99. > > Here is my (mloskot) story and funny replies from MS :-) > > http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=259043&SiteID=1 > > Cheers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
