Hello Rob, Friday, September 29, 2006, 7:12:12 PM, you wrote: RS> Actually, this could be what I noticed. It was only the error message RS> that said it was a fill style. My test slide consisted of only the word RS> "Gnash". You can duplicate this by doing the same with OpenOffice2 RS> Impress, then "export as SWF". The exported movies appear to be only swf v6.
I think there are SWF parsers around that tell the contents in textual form, which could be useful for you. >> However, shapes are already rendered in the same quality as Flash does >> and the speed is promising. The AGG website even claims that the anti RS> Does it work at the same level of functionality as the OpenGL backend ? Not yet, of course. But I expect it to do everything that is necessary to render Flash files correctly, including all kinds of gradients and bitmaps and such. Line styles are no problem at all and it's only a matter of time until fill styles will be complete. Even if AGG does not support something, it can be extended to do so since you have access to each level of the rendering pipeline. I hope that will not be necessary because I'm not a graphics specialist ;) Anyway, AGG offers *far* more than we need for Gnash... Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
