On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Rob Savoye <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 10/15/09 08:22, Weidong Li wrote:
>
> slower than flashlite.  However, gnash has a much better user interface
>> than
>> flashlite.  It is possible that I did not do everything right with gnash
>> so
>> that it appeared to be slower.
>>
>
>  Were your tests with swf animations or streaming video ?

I tested them with swf animations.  I also attempted to get them playing
streaming video from cnn, but did not have the patience to wait long enough
for them to actually play anything.

I suspect that there must be something in my setting that causes trouble
with processing streaming video.  I used firefox with gnash plugin to do the
streaming video.  Do you have any guess on what might be the problem, /tmp
setting, swap space, etc.?


>
>  In general, does anyone have any good idea to make gnash do the best it
>> can?
>>
>
>  As a start, I managed to beat oprofile into a streaming video performance
> test. You can see that log here:
> http://www.gnashdev.org/testcases/oprof_gnash_all.log. Oprofile seems to
> be a reasonably good tool for performance analysis, it's easier than using
> gprof.
>
That is helpful.  Thanks a lot!

>        - rob -
>
_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev

Reply via email to