On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:52:01PM -0700, Richard Wilbur wrote:
> Did you mean?
> String.prototype.getCached = function(container) { container.cached =
> this; };
Yes.
You're very welcome to review the tests. I committed this kind of test
in testsuite/actionscript.all/String.as (by the end).
> I assume this test was run on the PP? Therefore we wish to replicate
> this behaviour, not necessarily improve upon it.
Yeah, we can't behave differently from the PP, unless different versions
of the PP themselves behave differently, which would justify our drift :)
This is not uncommon so it's highly encouraged to run the String-v*.swf tests
built in actionscript.all with as many PP versions on as many systems as
possible
(win32/pp10 probably being the most important one).
> What if we made each cached object a reference to the original object as
> long as both are treated in a read-only fashion
Uhm. seems overkill at first thought.
Would mean impementing this referencing thing for all of as_object
as that's what the cached object would be (an as_object).
--strk;
Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer () ASCII Ribbon Campaign
http://foo.keybit.net/~strk/services.html /\ Keep it simple!
_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
