On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:44:46AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote: > The PASS is probably wrong. These bring up the issue of when the test > case itself is under development along with the code. As those functions > aren't implemented in Gnash, testing them is rather bogus. It'd probably > be a good idea to make them pass with the proprietary player, and then > make them XFAIL for Gnash till they're implemented.
I think it is a good idea too. This is why I was suggesting (in IRC, when we started the commit policy page) that testcases are committed separately from actual code. Of course committing togheter test and code is fine, but the general idea is that tests verified against the PP have a value on themselves as they serve the purpose of driving the implementation, representing the verified expected outputs. --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
