On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:29:38AM -0600, Craig Kelley wrote: > Yes, it will use more disk space temporarily to dump at a higher > framerate -- but after re-encoding, it will be the same size. I suspect > that you'll also have a higher quality file because the encoder will have > more data to work with. That being said, I think strk is correct that > having a general-purpose flag would be great.
Please guys, try the current master branch. There, we went back to the default of on-video-frame-per-heartbeat (100FPS) but we now allow to override that: dump-gnash -D smaller....@12 input.swf # 12FPS of video dump-gnash -D bigger....@36 input.swf # 32FPS of video dump-gnash -D huge.raw input.swf # 100FPS of video Didn't use a user-friendlier --rendering-fps switch as I didn't want to change too much of the current option parsing code. Not at this stage at least. --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
