On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:32:22AM -0700, Rob Savoye wrote: > On 12/20/10 10:13, strk wrote: > > > Important is something users will be pretty disappointed about. > > Critical doesn't let you develop (say: can't build or crashes at startup) > > But that would be a Blocker then...
Sure, anything from Blocker and above would be also blocker ... > I think adding a Critical field is > unnecessary. My definition of Blocker matches your definition of Critical. so you consider Security more severe than a bug blocking development ? 1. Wish 2. Minor 3. Normal 4. Important 5. Blocker 6. Security --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
