Hi, On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:13:58PM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> Here's the problem. I am following long-time accepted ways of handling > bugs. The problem is you and I disagree on this, so you assume your > opinion is always the correct one. When developers can't decide via > consensus on something like this, *somebody* has to decide, and that's > the maintainer. Course then you get upset, call me names, throw in a few > more insults, and do this publically to try to shame me into doing > things your way. All of this is counter productive to having any amount > of coordination between us active developers, because you feel like you > have to win all disagreements. I'm not into arguing or flame wars, so > sometimes a decision has to be made, even when it pisses you off. So my > decision is to use my definitions of bug severity, as I do the Gnash > releases. I thought that was what we agreed, but I guess you changed > your mind again. > > Gnash would be better off if we fought less, and cooperated more. > Instead your hostile behavior does nothing to push Gnash forward as a > project. If you are so upset because I changed a bug severity, my > suggestion is you need to relax more, and don't be so stressed out about > a such a minor thing. Turning every small disagreement in World War III > is only going to negatively effect Gnash, and it already has. If you > can't handle admitting I'm the maintainer of the Gnash project, (and the > release manager) and letting me do my job, you need to find a new > project where you can be the maintainer, and then you can always be > right. Otherwise I will overrule your dissenting opinions when I think > it's appropriate. Agreed. -antrik- _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
