FYI: I've tagged 49fb49a as release_0_8_9_final Guess I'll push the backport fix in the branch next.
--strk; On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:12:40AM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > I've downloaded the 0.8.9 tarball to try at figuring where to set > a git tag and found revno.h advertising commit id "257aa1e": > > gnash-0.8.9$ cat revno.h > static const char* BRANCH_REVNO = "20088"; > static const char* BRANCH_NICK = "release_0_8_9"; > static const char* COMMIT_ID = "257aa1e"; > > But reading the logs in the release_0_8_9 branch I see a subsequent > commit "49fb49a" which fixed the version number: > > -AC_INIT(gnash, 0.8.9~rc4) > +AC_INIT(gnash, 0.8.9) > > Now, the configure.ac in the tarball is the correct one (0.8.9) so > the question is: why is revno.h pointing to the previous commit ? > > I was thinking about starting to maintain a stable branch, which > is the reason why I'm looking at it. > > Branch release_0_8_9 contains two more commits, one fixing > rmp packaging and another setting release date in NEWS file. > May be worth backporting also a fix for a 0.8.9 blocker that > resurrected [1] > > [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?32579 > > --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
