On 08/04/11 10:51, Robinson Tryon wrote:

> What AVM2 pieces are feasible to implement for $1,400? I was under the
> impression that AVM2/AS3 was a much bigger job.

  Well, now you see the problem... I didn't raise that funding for that
task, cause it isn't really sufficient. My guess is that would cover the
initial analysis and research about the path to take to implement AVM2.

  The Haxe team suggested to me recently that we could use their
AVM2/AS3 runtime, which could be better than trying to use Lightspark or
Tamarin. But somebody needs to spend several weeks researching the
options. So far, nobody has been interested in doing that...

        - rob -

_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev

Reply via email to