I'm in the process of cleaning up the code.
This mail should go in a developers list, but
since Gnash has only one list I'll write it here.
The question is: should we really make a distinction
between user-defined function and built-in functions ?
The question is particularly related to inheritance,
that is: are the following to be handled differently ?
var obj1 = new Date();
var obj2 = new MyClass();
I think both 'Date' and 'MyClass' should evaluate
to the same Gnash class, which would be as_function.
The as_function would be the constructor, and will
provide a prototype to be used in the created
instance's __proto__ member. Does it sound ?
If we agree on this we should define our built-in
classes as instances of our as_function class.
These would likely be singletons as we don't need
multiple String,Date,Number constructor instances.
What do you think ?
--strk;
+----------------------------------------+
| Fight against software patents in EU! |
| www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org |
+----------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Gnash mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
