On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:26:09AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:22:44AM +0200, strk wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:56:23PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > Segmentation fauts are surely worth mentioning. > > I'm also interested in failures in the tests, except for > > the ones under actionscript.all. > > There are only the tests in libbase, then? They pass for me. > In misc-ming.all some executable are created, but nothing is run > with make check.
Not yet. Probably not in 0.7.2 anyway. I just committed an additional unit test under testsuite/server (but doesn't test so much yet). > > Finally, your backtraces do not include line numbers, please > > compile with debugging symbols and run trought gdb for better help. > > It is compiled with debugging symbols. However I am not completly > sure on what's going on with the test, like which test is failing, > nor how to reproduce the test outside of make check. The comand > used to run the test isn't printed, so I can't reproduce it using gdb > nor outside of make check. for each <name>.as, you can: # make <name>.swf # gprocessor -v <name>.swf --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
