In gcc 4.2+, the visibility of a class member has to be specified in the class 
definition rather than the implementation -- lack of a visibilty statement 
there results in an implicit visibility attribute.

klash specifies its visibility in the implementation, resulting in

klash_part.cpp:65: warning: 'KlashFactory::KlashFactory()': visibility 
attribute ignored because it
klash_part.cpp:50: warning: conflicts with previous declaration here
klash_part.cpp:69: warning: 'virtual KlashFactory::~KlashFactory()': 
visibility attribute ignored because it
klash_part.cpp:51: warning: conflicts with previous declaration here

The attached patch fixes it. (Tested only with 4.2, but since older gccs 
accepted both places, this shouldn't break anything).

Regards,
bero

-- 
Get your own Linux distribution -- http://www.yold.org/
--- gnash/plugin/klash/klash_part.cpp.ark	2007-02-01 14:51:23.000000000 +0100
+++ gnash/plugin/klash/klash_part.cpp	2007-02-01 14:52:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
 
 class KlashFactory : public KParts::Factory {
 public:
-    KlashFactory ();
-    virtual ~KlashFactory ();
-    virtual KParts::Part *createPartObject
+    KDE_NO_CDTOR_EXPORT KlashFactory ();
+    KDE_NO_CDTOR_EXPORT virtual ~KlashFactory ();
+    KDE_NO_CDTOR_EXPORT virtual KParts::Part *createPartObject
         (QWidget *wparent, const char *wname,
          QObject *parent, const char *name,
          const char *className, const QStringList &args);
@@ -62,15 +62,15 @@
 
 KInstance *KlashFactory::s_instance = 0;
 
-KDE_NO_CDTOR_EXPORT KlashFactory::KlashFactory () {
+KlashFactory::KlashFactory () {
     s_instance = new KInstance ("klash");
 }
 
-KDE_NO_CDTOR_EXPORT KlashFactory::~KlashFactory () {
+KlashFactory::~KlashFactory () {
     delete s_instance;
 }
 
-KDE_NO_EXPORT KParts::Part *KlashFactory::createPartObject
+KParts::Part *KlashFactory::createPartObject
   (QWidget *wparent, const char *wname,
    QObject *parent, const char * name,
    const char * cls, const QStringList & args) {
_______________________________________________
Gnash mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash

Reply via email to