On 2/26/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:35:11AM -0600, Meryl Silverburgh wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Meryl Silverburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 2/26/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:06:28AM +0100, strk wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:34:34PM -0600, Meryl Silverburgh wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Using flare to decompile the player2.swf, I think the swf creates an
> >> > > object 'Movie' which inherits from the MovieClip (buildin in Flash),
> >> > > but overloading the 'setMovie' and 'playMovie' functions.
> >> > >
> >> > > // the decompile code of player2.swf:
> >> > > logic.Movie extends MovieClip;
> >> > > var v2 = v1.prototype;
> >>
> >> BTW, where is 'v1' defined ?
> >>
>
> I think v1 is an anonymous function.
> var v1 = function () {
> };
> and then 'logic.MovieController' is assigned to it and extends it from
> MovieClip
> logic.MovieController = v1;
> logic.MovieController extends MovieClip;
>
Ok, seen. Our aim now is to *reduce* the testcase.
Is flare able to produce an SWF from that source code ?
Are you able to produce a *reduced* testcase showing
that Gnash doesn't behave as the proprietary player ?
--strk;
May be the problem in how the method 'setMovie', 'playMoive' are being called:
from the flare output:
My question is I don't see 'player.movie' is being set anywhere.
so how can the method 'setMovie', 'playMovie' can be called correctly?
frame 1 {
movie = player.movie;
movie.base_url = '/';
movie.tracker_cls = logic.PlayerTracker;
movie.setMovie(video_id, undefined, undefined, l, t);
movie.playMovie();
Stage.scaleMode = 'noScale';
Stage.addListener(this);
onResize = function () {
player.resize(Stage.width, Stage.height);
};
_______________________________________________
Gnash mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
_______________________________________________
Gnash mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
