On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:36:51PM +0100, strk wrote: > Both Ming, swfc and swfmill are able to generate every (virtually) tag of an > SWF, > while MTASC can only generate the ActionScript bytecode. > Ming, swfc and MTASC contain an ActionScript compiler while with swfmill you > have > to use ASM-like syntax. Another asm-only tool is flasm (flasm.sf.net), which > we > don't have a testing framework for (yet). > Ming additionally supports asm-like syntax. > Swfc uses Ming action compiler internally.
An integration to the above: At time of writing MTASC supports AS3 syntax (classes) while Ming (and thus swfc) doesn't. It's currently being worked on. --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
