On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:37:11 +1300
"Aaron Whitehouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I appreciate that you are trying to inspire people by offering a set
> of tangible results (sites that do not work currently which will work
> in the future), but the people who are best placed to determine what
> should be worked on, and in what order, are probably those doing the
> work.
>
> A conditional gift is the wrong way around - development will go
> faster if the developers have more resources. Offering a prize to
> achieve certain goals may change priorities, but is unlikely to
> dramatically increase speed.
Gnash should have at least a timeline, as gcc have:
http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline
This way we would know how much time we can expect to have the
feature X or Y added and we could donate with the security that it
would be done.
If there isn't a timeline, then nobody will donate, because
nobody will be sure what the development direction is. For example, I
don't know what will be "Gnash 1.0"... will it support everything Flash
supports now or not?
Thanks.
--
_______________________________________________
Gnash mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
