Sorry, was just the perfectionist in me.  Most all this is really mute since we 
still don't understand what the ? is for.  (i.e. you can ignore this babbling 
geek)

To start, I aggree with holding off on the correction. But to the regex itself, the core of the expression is the grouping [^ ?] (which will match anythingthing but blank or ?), but they wanted to make sure there was at least 1 character. So originally that repeated it once and used the * on the second, which is the regex modifier for 0 or more times. The plus sign is the regex for 1 or more. So they end up being the same. However, long story short, not sure if it was needed since they put that inside of beginning and end of line markers (the very first carat ^, and the ending dollar $).
The complication comes when they have to be escaped.  The shell is grabbing 
some of those characters and doing its own thing with them first.  For 
instance, the parenthesis are being escaped to get them thru the shell and to 
the regex pattern.
The plus sign must need that to. My only question is, why don't we need to 
escape the asterick.  But there's more than one way to do it.

Evan Greenacre
NSWCDD, K54
540 653 1780

**NOTICE**  If you are reading this notice, you are probably a beaucrat with 
entirely too much time on your hands.  If you complain about it, you will only 
prove my point.




From: Sam Geeraerts
Sent: Thu 8/20/2009 4:28 PM
To: Greenacre, Evan R CIV NSWCDD, K54
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: [gNewSense-users] possible error in gen-kernel 
b


Greenacre, Evan R CIV NSWCDD, K54 schreef:
Sorry if this gets threaded wrong.

But the SED script, the plus sign doesn't work unless its escaped:

sed -i 's/^\([^ ?]\+\)$/\1 ?/' $i

Doesn't that make it a literal plus instead of a regex plus?
_______________________________________________
gNewSense-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev

Reply via email to