Karl Goetz wrote: > * Changed the notice in debian/copyright regarding the right to > distribute modified binaries, now blessed by Mark "Just Because > I'm A CG Genius Doesn't Mean I'm Not A Stubborn Arsehole" Kilgard. > (Closes: #131997) > > I wonder if this means we can also distribute glut under the same terms > (since hes said thats what was intended), or if we need to be careful > with it too.
What makes you think that distribution under the same terms is not possible? I quote from [1]: || Would it be possible for you to just make it absolutely clear that || everyone's allowed to use, copy, and modify (and distribute their || modifications) of libglut? || Just quoting the above and replying "Yes, that's fine" or similar || would be || okay. | Yes, that's fine. It clearly says "everyone". But perhaps that's not what you're thinking about? ben [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=131997#71 _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev