I haven't had any answer from AMS yet. So the situation hasn't changed since the decision was taken to exclude amslatex from gns 3.
On the other hand, it hasn't changed since deciding that it could remain in 2.3 either. AMS has reassured people more than once that they want their stuff to be free software. Question is whether gns wants to rely on this more than on the literal license text. Karl Goetz wrote: > So, following the recent discussion. > > texlive-base # debian 477060 > texlive-latex-base # debian 483217 > > Any objections to re-including these packages? > kk > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-dev mailing list > gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
