At Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:43:22 +0200, Sam Geeraerts wrote: > > Dmitry Samoyloff schreef: > > At Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:00:46 +0200, > > Sam Geeraerts wrote: > >> Dmitry Samoyloff schreef: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> As far, as I've rebuilt new Gnash in the Builder several times already, > >>> ccache > >>> is certainly of help for me. Attached is a small 2-line patch for the > >>> Builder > >>> to support ccache. > >> Intersting idea. I have little experience with ccache. It's only useful > >> from the second time on a package is compiled, right? > > > > Yes. > > > >> Builder normally > >> compiles a package only once. I'm curious to know what the ccache > >> penalty is. If it makes Builder run a lot longer I'd rather not include > >> it by default. > > > > http://ccache.samba.org/performance.html > > > > Well, at least we could make it an option in config.local, right? > > Alright. I'll take a patch where's it's commented in config with an > explanation that it's useful to uncomment it when testing.
My branch with ccache support is available at http://obscurehalt.org/bzr/builder/ccache-support . -- I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom! <http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=7253> _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
