On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:03:05 +0100 Christophe Jarry <christophe.ja...@ouvaton.org> wrote:
> > When I `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc', I have a lot of > dependancy problems. I think those can only be solved by basing metad > entirely upon current version of Lenny Backport, which sounds > unlikely. a lot of dependency problems from xulrunner? > So where should I go from here? Is it better to: > -try packaging Lenny's version of xulrunner with bug fix? > -apply the fix to the metad's version of xulrunner? (Seems the best > option to me.) > -wait for Parkes release then fix the bug in it? If you could work on fixing it in parkes, that would be great. We still need a fix for metad though: I'd suggest removing galeon. We don't want to spend lots of time that could be spent moving forwards propping it up. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
