> Yeah, for patches it's convenient to have the file attached. OK. > .py to the file name? I'd argue against it. I strongly disagree. "The filename extension was originally used to easily determine the file's generic type." [1] Imagine a system without extensions. It will be such a mess!
> The person running the software doesn't need to care (or know) what its > written in. It's usually better to provide more information. .py is more informative that just "a file." I've looked through some projects written in Python. [2, 3, 4] All of them have the extension for the source code. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filename_extension [2] https://github.com/pybrain/pybrain [3] https://github.com/scipy/scipy [4] https://github.com/numpy/numpy _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
