On Tue Oct 8 03:03:52 2013 Marek Buras <cyf...@sdf.org> wrote: > Hello! > > I've looked at the bugs list today as I used to do in the past. While > searching for a candidate to solve I've found those five: > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?40185 > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?40186 > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?40187 > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?40188 > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?40193 > > Are they really bugs? In all cases there's a word "free" used as in "free > beer" in relation to some propriatary programs which are (or where at > the time of writing the files) free as in beer and nothing more. Noone > suggests using those programs nor the information is visible in the > libraries. Should we really patch those packages? Maybe it's better to > mark them as "won't fix" and move to the other ones?
I am mobile at the moment but from memory the fsdg requires a clear extortion not to use proprietory software when it is mentioned. Due to the ambiguous wording noted in the bugs i would say they are valid. Thanks, kk _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
