On Monday 27 November 2006 15:09, Daniel Taylor wrote: > Karl Goetz wrote: > > Andrew Wigglesworth wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> We've had a lot of interesting conversation about the freedom of > >> gNewSense. General stuff around the need for freedom and that not > >> everything may be free in gNewSense. > >> > >> The possibility of non-free packages in gNewSense is bug number 1 in > >> the bug tracker: > >> > >> http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00001 > > > > There are some people who have started trying to get organised. Perhaps > > if they ping you you can get organised together. > > kk > > I've started this process my self, but only got through about 20 > packages in main before my head began to hurt. I think the best idea > would be to split it up into groups (ie. you take the A's and I take the > B's). > > Just from the 20 or so I've done already I've found that things are > generally not as clear cut as "this is gpl'ed", for example the 'ark' > package contains files that are under Artistic/BSD/GPL/FDL licences. > > - Daniel >
Hi, does that mean you've been working on some of the "a" packages in Main? Could you email me with the details so that we don't duplicate work. There's now a "Freedom verification" section on the wiki, so you can volunteer away to your hearts content :-) -- Andrew Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
