Brian, Being British, I prefer the existing date format. The distro isn't about me though, so I guess if the ISO standard is easier to use, and people are happy for it to go that way, then it can be changed.
Does anyone have a preference, either way? Many thanks, Chris. On 17/10/2007, Brian Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I didn't really change the format, as the header already said date > should be in "DD MMM YY" format. I only fixed those entried which > didn't conform to that format. > > I would have preferred ISO 8601*, YYYY-MM-DD, because that's easy to > parse and it's very unambiguous, but everyone seems to prefer DD MMM > YY. ymmv. :) > > *Yes I know I'm weird. I write ISO 8601 on my cheques. :D > > I have programming ability, just no familiarity with the Free world > and not much time to learn. So I do PFV for the moment. It helps me > learn where things are supposed to go. > > > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users > -- Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ A great GNU/Linux distro: http://wiki.gnewsense.org/ _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
